Politics Vs Economics

political relation vs economics2004Hayek is one of representatives and the biggest figure in neo-Austrian economical agree aim (variant of monetarism , one of the brightest defenders of liberal-market conception and non-intervention of presidency into economics , novice of socialist economy , communism , etatism andHayek about modernization of politics : law against directives . When we equal with affirmation of J . Bjunekken about high gear importance of natural choice , we need to examine which principles should be in the instauration of constitution of political life . let s see the ideas of famous economist Fredrick Fon Hayek which find reflection in his monograph The genius of self-direction (1960In case Bjunekken examines groups of lobbyists pressure as crop of spontaneous self-establishment of civil society , Hay ek estimates it much more critic ally . He indicates that organization of influential groups of special interests is im doable without divine service of government . Besides because it is principally impossible to organize all interests organization of decided groups leads with help of government to constant using of non-organized groups and groups which send packing non be organized . Victims in this process exit such groups as consumers in common , tax-payers , women , elderly flock and many others (Gamble 2000 169-189Such prohibit estimation of groups of special interests gave possibility to Hayek to air critically at the very democratic government . He wrote that any condition (force ) should be limited , but in particular it concerns democratic ply . Omnipotent democratic government only due to plenum of its strength becomes a toy in manpower of organized interests , because it should ravish them , in order to provide offer of majorityBasing on this , Hayek make s cultivation that main purpose of constitu! tional rules is severe limitation of rights and powers of primal power , doesn t matter which democratic commission of life it could have Hayek proposed to distinguish laws as universal rules , which can be applied to terra incognita number of collisions , possible in the nearest future(a) and directives for definite claims .

Only constant , stable and universally recognized schema of rules can limit possibility of legalized corruption - entry chthonian pressure of different lobbies of parliament (or presidential ) directives , well-favoured in the name of political union special privilegesIn his sacred script ure The Constitution of Freedom Hayek determines granting immunity as absence of fixture (Sufrin 1961 , 201-204 . We can easily project that he is quite free in choice of determination , but it is difficult to understand its smell out , in case we will not make pass water term , opposite to freedom - compulsion . Hayek proposes to determine compulsion as right of tyrannical government , he insists that it should be monopolized by the government and and then after brought up to tokenish . He notices also that it is possible to allow only receipts and definite limited forms of governmental performance , executed in the interests of societyMany other supporters of economical liberalism , who tire out t accept governmental activity in no way , - even in those strictly limited spheres , in which Hayek allows it , - rung about hesitations concerning Hayek s orthodoxy (Rees 1963 , 346-360 . But those fears were dead because Hayek would never accept that government...If you demand to get a in force(p) essay, order it on our! website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper